8 posts found
Cursor 3 launched multi-agent with 8 parallel agents. Claude Code fits 30,000 lines in a single prompt. Diffs fail 40% of the time — full rewrites drop it to 0%. Here's the architecture that makes it all work.
Gartner predicts 40%+ of agentic AI projects will be scrapped by 2027. Anthropic says: 'don't build agents when workflows suffice.' And in 2026, the market conversation shifted from 'building agents' to 'orchestrating agents.' Start with the rails.
Prompt injection isn't a bug — it's a fundamental property of current LLM architecture. The Countermind paper proposes 4-layer defense. OWASP's Top 10 for LLMs lists prompt injection as vulnerability #1. And your 'hardened' system prompt won't save you.
FloTorch's February 2026 benchmark shocked the community: recursive 512-token chunking BEAT semantic. 80% of RAG failures trace to ingestion, not the LLM. And the 'simple' strategy is often the best. Here's the guide I wish I'd read sooner.
+8.3% accuracy. Up to 2.4x faster. 75.6% fewer tokens. Training cost: $4.27. RecursiveMAS proves that when AIs stop 'talking' and start 'thinking together,' everything changes.
60% of production projects use both. The combined approach hits 96% accuracy vs 89% RAG-only and 91% fine-tuning-only. Salesforce's AI VP cut hallucinations from 12% to 3%. But where do you start?
512,000 lines of code leaked. 1,906 files. And the revelation that shocked the community: the AI itself is a while loop with one core function. The other 98% is traditional software engineering. Brilliant.
Did Claude Skills come to replace MCP? No. They're complementary layers of the same architecture. Here's why using both together is the right answer.